The issue regarding FDI in multi-brand retail trade has been blistering
since the UPA announced this on 24th November, 2011. All political
parties baring the Congress Party, the Nationalist Congress Party, the
Rashtriya Lok Dal and the Rashtriya Janatha Dal have expressed their
concern against the policy. The issue hot up during the current winter
session of Parliament and almost for a week there was dead lock in both
houses of Parliament the FDI issue. All the opposition parties
insisted upon discussion with voting on the issue of allowing FDI in
multi-brand retail trade in both the Houses of Parliament (Lok Sabha and
Rajya Sabha). But the government was against any such discussion with
voting because of its lack of confidence to muster enough support in the
voting due to the fact that DMK, the main constituent of UPA, was
vociferously opposing FDI in multi-brand retail trade. Mr. Karunanidhi
had always been saying that his party was totally against FDI in
multi-brand retail. In fact, the executive council of the DMK party
passed a resolution stating that it will not support the government on
FDI in retail trade. Moreover, both BSP and SP, which are providing
support to UPA government from outside, were also vehemently opposing
FDI in multi-brand retail-trade and had been saying that they will not
support the government on the issue of FDI in retail trade. Despite best
efforts to express their disagreement, the government stood firm to
allow FDI in multi-brand retail trade. They forced UPA to discuss this
issue in both house of parliament with voting rights. Entire nation has
been witness as to how majority of politicians had their own doubts
against FDI and its adverse effects. Together with the DMK President
M.Karunanidhi, the BSP supremo Mrs. Mayawati and the SP supremo Mr.
Mulayam Singh Yadav, the Congress party and the UPA government have
enacted the most foul scenes of inducement, appeasement, cajoling and
bullying. And the nation stood aghast when it was found that these
political parties how suddenly changed their profile and to support Govt
by voting or abstaining. This upside down changed can only happen if
Congress has done something very strong in return. CPI (M) Politburo
Member Sitaram Yechury slammed the UPA government for the "hanky-panky"deals to secure a majority against the motion on FDI
in retail. He said: รขSomething extra has happened" threat,
intimidation, a bribe or a promise of doing something." Now is
disturbing to know (as per the lobbying disclosure reports filed by
Walmart with the US Senate) that Walmart has spent about $25 million
(around Rs. 125 crore) since 2008 for its various lobbying activities,
especially for allowing FDI in mutli-brand retail trade India. What a
shame?
The Times of India, Dec.11, 2012
The Times of India, Dec.11, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment